tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7604651383458762146.post6176547592781859673..comments2021-05-19T05:49:03.931-07:00Comments on BORDERWALL AS ARCHITECTURE: Bridging SpaceUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7604651383458762146.post-41045236420308524832009-04-17T10:01:00.000-07:002009-04-17T10:01:00.000-07:00Having explicitly accepted the bridge as a heterot...Having explicitly accepted the bridge as a heterotopia, I believe you even critique the very excercise of 'designing' the (humane) wall very well by insinuating that the excercise attempts to MAKE you design the Foucault's Garden within a city! that exists only so that the city continues buisness as usual but provides intervals of relief to whoever needs it (?) But the wall/city/boundaries are a given that your profession accepts and works around...when does the scope of design stop exactly? or can you work around most conditions of marginalization, migration, polarization, poverty etc through DESIGN?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com